Comparison
Read two legal systems against each other
Because every portal follows the same fifteen-section outline, the comparison is genuinely like-for-like rather than a collage of whatever each government happens to publish.
Select up to six documented jurisdictions
Clear selectionAfghanistanAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorraAngolaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBhutanBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBruneiBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaColombiaComorosCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCyprusCzechiaDR CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEswatiniEthiopiaFijiFinlandFranceGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHoly See (Vatican City)HondurasHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyIvory CoastJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKuwaitKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMarshall IslandsMauritaniaMauritiusMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNorth KoreaNorth MacedoniaNorwayOmanPakistanPalauPalestinePanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalQatarRepublic of the CongoRomaniaRussiaRwandaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaSão Tomé and PrÃncipeTajikistanTanzaniaThailandThe BahamasTimor-LesteTogoTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuelaVietnamYemenZambiaZimbabwe
| Attribute | BhutanReviewed | SwedenReviewed |
|---|---|---|
| Legal family | Mixed common law and Buddhist customary tradition | Civil law (Nordic) |
| System of governmentIdentical | Constitutional monarchy | Constitutional monarchy |
| Constitution | Constitution of the Kingdom of Bhutan | The four Fundamental Laws (Grundlagar) |
| In force since | 2008 | 1974 |
| Capital | Thimphu | Stockholm |
| Official languages | Dzongkha | Swedish |
| Currency | Bhutanese ngultrum (BTN) | Swedish krona (SEK) |
| Population | 787,000 | 10,600,000 |
| Division of powers | Unitary with constitutionally entrenched local government: 20 dzongkhags, each with an elected Dzongkhag Tshogdu, plus gewog and thromde councils. Article 22 requires devolution of power to elected local governments, and local bodies have defined planning and revenue functions. | Parliamentary government with a ceremonial monarch, strong independent public agencies that ministers may not instruct on individual cases, and separate general and administrative courts. |
| How law is made | Bills pass both houses; disagreement goes to a joint sitting. The King grants assent, and if he withholds it the bill returns to a joint sitting where a two-thirds majority carries it. Money bills originate in the National Assembly. Constitutional amendment requires a three-quarters majority of a joint sitting and, if the King so directs, a national referendum. | Government bills are prepared through the distinctive committee-of-inquiry and referral (remiss) process, examined by Riksdag committees and the Council on Legislation, and adopted by the Riksdag. |
| Legal profession | Regulated by the Bhutan National Legal Institute and the Jabmi Tshogdey (Bar Council) under the Jabmi Act. Practitioners, called jabmis, require a law degree — historically obtained in India — and a licence; the Jigme Singye Wangchuck School of Law in Thimphu graduated its first cohort in 2022, so domestic legal education is very new. The profession is small, numbering a few hundred licensed practitioners. | The title advokat is reserved for members of the Swedish Bar Association; representation in court is otherwise relatively open. |
A comparison table flattens nuance by design. Where a difference matters to a decision you are making, open both portals and read the section in full — the constitutional detail behind a one-line summary is often the part that governs the outcome.